Comments on: Is the DMOZ Open Directory Project dead? http://venetsian.com/dmoz-open-directory-project-dead/ SEO Expert, Web Enterpreneur, Online Publishing Specialist Fri, 12 Aug 2011 16:24:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: AntiDmoz http://venetsian.com/dmoz-open-directory-project-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-2765 AntiDmoz Fri, 12 Aug 2011 16:24:14 +0000 http://venetsian.com/?p=187#comment-2765 This post could be 10 year old i just can not resist, if you would like to get listed you have to have the following in place 1 . befriend a mystic volunteer - you will get listed 2. pay a volunteer - you will get listed 3. if you are a corporate pay a few - then you will get listed FAST Dmoz is dead " No" just the intention...... *ps the error means that you did not pay to be reviewed. finally "purpose of DMOZ" to stay the biggest link farm of them all. This post could be 10 year old i just can not resist, if you would like to get listed you have to have the following in place

1 . befriend a mystic volunteer – you will get listed
2. pay a volunteer – you will get listed
3. if you are a corporate pay a few – then you will get listed FAST

Dmoz is dead ” No” just the intention……

*ps the error means that you did not pay to be reviewed.

finally
“purpose of DMOZ” to stay the biggest link farm of them all.

]]> By: Richard Gagnon http://venetsian.com/dmoz-open-directory-project-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-2717 Richard Gagnon Mon, 14 Feb 2011 22:42:52 +0000 http://venetsian.com/?p=187#comment-2717 The other problem DMOZ has is an overly fussy anal editorial staff. I was a volunteer for a small graphics program, Painter. I searched through hundreds of Google hits to find good tutorials and add them to the site, only to have senior editors remove them because they were "deep links" (links within a site). Even though I spent days finding Painter tutorials buried within larger graphics sites, the senior editors removed them because they only wanted the main site listed, forcing Painter users to wade through hundreds of tutorials to the find the ones I discovered. They even moved one link that had 100 painter tutorials to a category for personal websites--which ensures that no Painter user will ever see those tutorials. The editors essentially forced me to quit. DMOZ would prefer to have no editor on a category than one that doesn't have their same anal obsession to dotting "i's" and "t's" than have somebody that wants to make a useful category. The other problem DMOZ has is an overly fussy anal editorial staff. I was a volunteer for a small graphics program, Painter. I searched through hundreds of Google hits to find good tutorials and add them to the site, only to have senior editors remove them because they were “deep links” (links within a site). Even though I spent days finding Painter tutorials buried within larger graphics sites, the senior editors removed them because they only wanted the main site listed, forcing Painter users to wade through hundreds of tutorials to the find the ones I discovered. They even moved one link that had 100 painter tutorials to a category for personal websites–which ensures that no Painter user will ever see those tutorials. The editors essentially forced me to quit.

DMOZ would prefer to have no editor on a category than one that doesn’t have their same anal obsession to dotting “i’s” and “t’s” than have somebody that wants to make a useful category.

]]> By: Akyaka http://venetsian.com/dmoz-open-directory-project-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-648 Akyaka Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:10:22 +0000 http://venetsian.com/?p=187#comment-648 I do believe that if people do not get moeny for what they do sooner or later they quit it. Why should they work for free? It is normal that now dmoz doesntr anwer any questions. I was trying to add some some dites but I think it is useless, cause you do not eben know if there is an editor of that part of dmoz or you should write to a higher category! I do believe that if people do not get moeny for what they do sooner or later they quit it. Why should they work for free? It is normal that now dmoz doesntr anwer any questions. I was trying to add some some dites but I think it is useless, cause you do not eben know if there is an editor of that part of dmoz or you should write to a higher category!

]]> By: Jane http://venetsian.com/dmoz-open-directory-project-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-552 Jane Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:49:29 +0000 http://venetsian.com/?p=187#comment-552 I have to agree wholeheartedly with your opinion of the selection of editors for DMOZ. If you admit you are a professional designer you will be automatically denied editor status. That is silly and as the author says, leads to a lot of editors who are technologically challenged. Frankly, despite being 11 years old, it is still a bit of a joke. They do not correctly list even the name of area I live in which had a population of 500,000 and of the 3 sites listed for my area (yep, only 3), 2 show page errors. Sorta hard to take too seriously :) I have to agree wholeheartedly with your opinion of the selection of editors for DMOZ.

If you admit you are a professional designer you will be automatically denied editor status.

That is silly and as the author says, leads to a lot of editors who are technologically challenged.

Frankly, despite being 11 years old, it is still a bit of a joke. They do not correctly list even the name of area I live in which had a population of 500,000 and of the 3 sites listed for my area (yep, only 3), 2 show page errors.

Sorta hard to take too seriously :)

]]> By: Frenchy http://venetsian.com/dmoz-open-directory-project-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-516 Frenchy Mon, 08 Jun 2009 02:54:45 +0000 http://venetsian.com/?p=187#comment-516 Google still loves DMOZ very much. I have proven that. Sometime in early 2008, when I was still very new to making-money-online stuff, I tried to experiment with making a website from Freewebs. At that time, I still don't know that blogs alone can be monetized so I really wanted to learn to make a real website and not just a blog. So, after a few sleepless nights of trying hard to learn to make a website from Freewebs, a cluttered dessert recipe website was born. I know it's not a good website and its contents were just edited copies from other sites. I was never proud of that website so I never showed it to anyone and there's no promotion involved in building it. Freewebs has a feature of sending your website to DMOZ after its publication. Not even sure of what I was doing at that time, I opted for this feature and after following series of instructions, I was able to send my dessert website to DMOZ. Fast forward sometime early this year, when I was doing a job for a client where I have to send his website to different directories where DMOZ was one of them, I suddenly remembered the dessert recipe website I did on Freewebs. I found out that the cluttered website has been successfully listed in DMOZ. And when I checked the website itself, I found out that it has a Page Rank of 4 and it's on the first page and top 6 listing in Google for the keyword "easy desserts". I was surprised for it's getting some traffic without even promoting it and the contents were not to many - maybe not more than 40 recipes all in all. This made me realize how important is DMOZ to Google. Until now I have never promoted the website yet and I don't really have any idea on what to do with it. This is the first time that I have talked about this and exposed it. It has some adsense ads and it is getting few clicks. If you have suggestions you can share to me, please let me know. The URL of the website is http://sweettoothsite.webs.com Thanks. Google still loves DMOZ very much. I have proven that.

Sometime in early 2008, when I was still very new to making-money-online stuff, I tried to experiment with making a website from Freewebs. At that time, I still don’t know that blogs alone can be monetized so I really wanted to learn to make a real website and not just a blog. So, after a few sleepless nights of trying hard to learn to make a website from Freewebs, a cluttered dessert recipe website was born. I know it’s not a good website and its contents were just edited copies from other sites. I was never proud of that website so I never showed it to anyone and there’s no promotion involved in building it.

Freewebs has a feature of sending your website to DMOZ after its publication. Not even sure of what I was doing at that time, I opted for this feature and after following series of instructions, I was able to send my dessert website to DMOZ.

Fast forward sometime early this year, when I was doing a job for a client where I have to send his website to different directories where DMOZ was one of them, I suddenly remembered the dessert recipe website I did on Freewebs. I found out that the cluttered website has been successfully listed in DMOZ. And when I checked the website itself, I found out that it has a Page Rank of 4 and it’s on the first page and top 6 listing in Google for the keyword “easy desserts”. I was surprised for it’s getting some traffic without even promoting it and the contents were not to many – maybe not more than 40 recipes all in all. This made me realize how important is DMOZ to Google.

Until now I have never promoted the website yet and I don’t really have any idea on what to do with it. This is the first time that I have talked about this and exposed it. It has some adsense ads and it is getting few clicks. If you have suggestions you can share to me, please let me know. The URL of the website is http://sweettoothsite.webs.com

Thanks.

]]> By: Kulrom http://venetsian.com/dmoz-open-directory-project-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-504 Kulrom Sat, 06 Jun 2009 11:11:27 +0000 http://venetsian.com/?p=187#comment-504 It is not dead actually ... although i would like it taken down. It is pretty unfair that one site is listed just because you've found someone to does that for you. Many quality websites were never listed as nobody suggested them ... very bad approach indeed. However it is not dead just more restrictive. It is not dead actually … although i would like it taken down.
It is pretty unfair that one site is listed just because you’ve found someone to does that for you. Many quality websites were never listed as nobody suggested them … very bad approach indeed. However it is not dead just more restrictive.

]]> By: W-SEO http://venetsian.com/dmoz-open-directory-project-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-480 W-SEO Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:09:14 +0000 http://venetsian.com/?p=187#comment-480 Don’t worry Venetsian, I wait more of 6 months for my projects Don’t worry Venetsian,
I wait more of 6 months for my projects

]]> By: Andy http://venetsian.com/dmoz-open-directory-project-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-379 Andy Thu, 21 May 2009 09:46:05 +0000 http://venetsian.com/?p=187#comment-379 Whilst I think it is a valuable resource, any benefit that Google gives to DMOZ listed websites should be virtually none until the whole process is improved. Whilst I think it is a valuable resource, any benefit that Google gives to DMOZ listed websites should be virtually none until the whole process is improved.

]]> By: Venetsian http://venetsian.com/dmoz-open-directory-project-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-309 Venetsian Tue, 05 May 2009 18:34:21 +0000 http://venetsian.com/?p=187#comment-309 Well, you seem to know much better than me, but I still think that the whole DMOZ volunteer editorial approval process should be improved. I saw your post saying that from few thousand applicants you've approved only few. Maybe that's one of the reasons things are very slow. Well, you seem to know much better than me, but I still think that the whole DMOZ volunteer editorial approval process should be improved. I saw your post saying that from few thousand applicants you’ve approved only few. Maybe that’s one of the reasons things are very slow.

]]> By: makrhod http://venetsian.com/dmoz-open-directory-project-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-305 makrhod Tue, 05 May 2009 05:08:25 +0000 http://venetsian.com/?p=187#comment-305 In answer to this same concern in the Digital Point forums, I explained that the above error is a known bug awaiting a fix by AOL staff, but it relates only to trying to contact a volunteer editor, and has nothing to do with suggesting a site for review. It also seems that you might misunderstand the purpose of DMOZ, which is not a listing service, and reviewing suggestions is not a priority for volunteers, who are active in many other ways. Editors find sites wherever they can, and suggestions made by others are nothing more than one resource they can use if they choose. As a final point, DMOZ is owned by AOL, not Google, so if any money is to spent, I doubt that Google will spend it. ;-) In answer to this same concern in the Digital Point forums, I explained that the above error is a known bug awaiting a fix by AOL staff, but it relates only to trying to contact a volunteer editor, and has nothing to do with suggesting a site for review.
It also seems that you might misunderstand the purpose of DMOZ, which is not a listing service, and reviewing suggestions is not a priority for volunteers, who are active in many other ways. Editors find sites wherever they can, and suggestions made by others are nothing more than one resource they can use if they choose.
As a final point, DMOZ is owned by AOL, not Google, so if any money is to spent, I doubt that Google will spend it. ;-)

]]>